Main Menu
Home
News
Newsletters
Why Nuclear
Members' Letters
Links
About Us
Contact Us
Search
Join SONE
Podcasts
Syndicate
Supporters Of Nuclear Energy (SONE)
For more information about SONE... Click to download pdf Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement
UK Raises ‘Regulatory Issue’ Over Westinghouse AP1000 Design PDF Print E-mail
Written by NucNet   
Tuesday, 16 February 2010
There is a lack of evidence to show that key structures within Westinghouse’s AP1000 reactor unit would be sufficiently robust to protect the unit’s safety systems under normal conditions, and also from severe weather and other external hazards, the UK’s nuclear safety and security regulator said today.
The Health and Safety Executive’s Nuclear Directorate said it had raised a “regulatory issue” (RI) against the AP1000 relating to the proposed new steel-concrete-steel construction design for key structures within the nuclear island.

The Nuclear Directorate said it is not yet satisfied that the proposed steel-concrete-steel modular construction method, which would be used for some key structures, could protect the reactor’s safety systems from severe weather and other external hazards such as physical impact. The directorate has asked Westinghouse for evidence to show that the strength and durability of the structures have been adequately justified.

The modular construction approach proposed by Westinghouse involves a sandwich of steel plates filled with concrete, rather than using more conventional reinforced concrete, which is strengthened with internal steel bars.

Westinghouse is considering a number of possible solutions, such as further analysis and testing and possible changes to the design. The company intends to provide detailed proposals and supporting evidence by the end of October 2010.

The US nuclear regulator, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, has also raised an issue regarding the design. The UK’s Nuclear Directorate said it is working closely with the NRC to ensure “maximum leverage and harmonisation of outcomes”.

The Nuclear Directorate said raising RIs does not mean that the designs are unsafe. The directorate is still assessing designs on paper, so any safety detriment is still in the design stage.

Two nuclear reactor designs – the AP1000 and Areva/EDF’s UK European Pressurised Water Reactor (UK-EPR) – are going through a generic design assessment (GDA) process in the UK.

More details are online
< Previous   Next >
Downloads

Because of successive changes, much of SONE's literature gives incorrect information about contacting us. The Secretary is Sir Bernard Ingham at:

9 Monahan Avenue
Purley
Surrey
CR8 3BB

Tel:  020 8660 8970
Mobile:  07860 535962
Email:  sec@sone.org.uk


Key SONE downloads:

 


Nuclear questions dispelled

Questions & Answers
PDF (88k) 14/11/2009 

 

Letters to political parties

Conservative Party
doc (28k) 06/11/2009

Labour Party
doc (28k) 06/11/2009 

Liberal Democrat Party
doc (28k) 06/11/2009

Unions
doc (28k) 06/11/2009 

 

Irish Counterpart

BENE
PDF (400k) 22/12/2012

 

Speaking Notes

Energy Syndrome
doc (111k) 30/12/2010

 

SONE Briefing Notes

The Case For Nuclear Power

PDF (88k) 02/02/2012

Energy Facts 2012

PDF (90k) 31/01/2012

Decommissioning in Perspective
PDF (152k) 06/01/2009

Briefing Notes Energy Conservation
PDF (136k) 21/11/2008

Briefing Notes Carbon Cull
PDF (156k) 10/11/2008

Looming Energy Crisis Leaflet
PDF (76k) 22/10/2008

Briefing Notes Energy
PDF (296k) 20/10/2008

Briefing Notes Nuclear
PDF (148k) 20/06/2008

Plutonium in Perspective 
PDF (296k) 01/03/2008

Briefing Notes Hydrogen
PDF (72k) 29/05/2007

Briefing Notes Renewables
PDF (285k) 29/05/2007

Briefing Notes Waste
PDF (352k) 25/04/2007

Briefing Notes
Micro-generation

PDF (56k) 29/06/2006

Briefing Notes Uranium Availability
PDF (44k) 20/01/2006



Click for more downloads